Current:Home > FinanceKansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds -Blueprint Money Mastery
Kansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds
View
Date:2025-04-15 14:12:08
TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — Kansas isn’t enforcing a new law requiring abortion providers to ask patients why they want to terminate their pregnancies, as a legal challenge against that rule and other older requirements makes its way through the courts.
Attorneys for the state and for providers challenging the new law along with other requirements announced a deal Thursday. In return for not enforcing the law, the state will get another four months to develop its defense of the challenged restrictions ahead of a trial now delayed until late June 2025. The agreement was announced during a Zoom hearing in Johnson County District Court in the Kansas City area.
Kansas doesn’t ban most abortions until the 22nd week of pregnancy. Its clinics now see thousands of patients from other states with near bans on abortion, most notably Missouri, Oklahoma and Texas.
Last fall, District Judge K. Christopher Jayaram blocked enforcement of requirements that include rules spelling out what providers must tell their patients, and a longstanding requirement that patients wait 24 hours after consulting a provider to undergo a procedure. On July 1, he allowed the providers to add a challenge to the new reporting law to their existing lawsuit rather than making them file a separate case.
The new law was supposed to take effect July 1 and would require providers to ask patients questions from a state script about their reasons for an abortion, although patients wouldn’t be forced to answer. Potential reasons include not being able to afford a child, not wanting a disabled child, not wanting to put schooling or a career on hold, and having an abusive spouse or partner. Clinics would be required to send data about patients’ answers to the state health department for a public report every six months.
“We are relieved that this intrusive law will not take effect,” the Center for Reproductive Rights, the national organization for abortion provider Planned Parenthood and the regional Planned Parenthood affiliate said in a joint statement. “This law would have forced abortion providers to collect deeply personal information — an unjustifiable invasion of patient privacy that has nothing to do with people’s health.”
Kansas already collects data about each abortion, such as the method and the week of pregnancy, but abortion opponents argue that having more information will aid in setting policies for helping pregnant women and new mothers. The Republican-controlled Legislature enacted the law over a veto from Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly.
At least eight other states have such reporting requirements, but the Kansas Supreme Court declared in 2019 that the state constitution protects access to abortion as a part of a “fundamental” right to bodily autonomy. In August 2022, Kansas voters decisively rejected a proposed amendment to say that the constitution doesn’t grant any right to abortion access.
The trial of the providers’ lawsuit had been set for late February 2025 before Jayaram delayed it in responded to the parties’ deal.
“The state is prepared to accept an agreement not to enforce the new law until the final judgment, provided that we get a schedule that accommodates the record that we think we need to develop in this case,” said Lincoln Wilson, a senior counsel for the anti-abortion Alliance Defending Freedom, which is leading the state’s defense of its laws.
Abortion providers suggested July 1 that the state wouldn’t enforce the new reporting requirement while the lawsuit proceeded, but the health department did not confirm that when reporters asked about it.
veryGood! (9469)
Related
- Tree trimmer dead after getting caught in wood chipper at Florida town hall
- No criminal charges after 4 newborn bodies found in a freezer
- Cheryl Burke Sets the Record Straight on Past Comments Made About Dancing With the Stars
- ‘A step back in time': America’s Catholic Church sees an immense shift toward the old ways
- What to watch: O Jolie night
- Police fatally shoot a man who sliced an officer’s face during a scuffle
- WNBA ticket sales on StubHub are up 93%. Aces, Caitlin Clark and returning stars fuel rise
- Mystery of 'Midtown Jane Doe' solved after 55 years as NYC cops ID teen murder victim
- Louvre will undergo expansion and restoration project, Macron says
- 'Succession' star Brian Cox opens up about religion, calls the Bible 'one of the worst books'
Ranking
- Angelina Jolie nearly fainted making Maria Callas movie: 'My body wasn’t strong enough'
- NHL playoffs results: Hurricanes advance, Bruins fumble chance to knock out Maple Leafs
- Tesla lays off charging, new car and public policy teams in latest round of cuts
- South Carolina Senate takes up ban on gender-affirming care for transgender minors
- Mets have visions of grandeur, and a dynasty, with Juan Soto as major catalyst
- Badass Moms. 'Short-Ass Movies.' How Netflix hooks you with catchy categories.
- These are the most dangerous jobs in America
- Clear is now enrolling people for TSA PreCheck at these airports
Recommendation
US wholesale inflation accelerated in November in sign that some price pressures remain elevated
The Daily Money: Will the Fed make a move?
Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, All Kid-ding Aside
32 Mother’s Day Gift Ideas Under $10 That Your Mom Will Actually Use
Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
Trump’s comparison of student protests to Jan. 6 is part of effort to downplay Capitol attack
Remains of child found in duffel bag in Philadelphia neighborhood identified as missing boy
Potential shooter 'neutralized' outside Wisconsin middle school Wednesday, authorities say